Anyone using NetDocs ndMax/Pattern Builder?

Exploring NetDocs ndMax/Pattern Builder: Is it Worth the Investment?

Greetings, fellow legal professionals!

As a firm with extensive experience using NetDocs, we find ourselves at a crossroads regarding the adoption of ndMax/Pattern Builder. This tool promises numerous efficiencies, yet it comes with a substantial price tag. We’re contemplating its potential return on investment and would appreciate insights from those who’ve already integrated it into their practices.

A significant concern within our organization is the concept of the “death of the billable hour.” With that in mind, we’re curious if others have successfully leveraged these tools to reduce time spent on “non-billable” tasks, and if so, to what effect?

Additionally, we’re eager to learn how these tools have assisted in optimizing the legal process beyond mere summaries. If you’ve had experience with ndMax/Pattern Builder, we would greatly value your feedback on its impact and usefulness in practical applications. Share your successes and thoughts in the comments—we’re all ears!

One response to “Anyone using NetDocs ndMax/Pattern Builder?”

  1. ccadmin avatar

    Hello there,

    It’s great to hear that your firm is evaluating NetDocs ndMax/Pattern Builder, as it’s a robust tool that many firms are considering to streamline their legal processes. I understand your concerns regarding the cost and the impact on billable hours, which are common considerations when adopting any advanced software.

    From what I’ve gathered, ndMax/Pattern Builder has shown promise in creating efficiencies that can balance out its initial cost. Here are a few insights and practical advice that might help you in your evaluation:

    1. Reduction of Non-Billable Hours: One of the significant advantages of using solutions like ndMax/Pattern Builder is the automation of document creation. By leveraging templates and automating repetitive processes, many firms have reported a substantial reduction in the time spent on document drafting, which is traditionally non-billable. In some cases, firms have seen a reduction in drafting time by up to 50%, allowing attorneys more time to focus on billable, substantive legal tasks.

    2. Enhanced Accuracy and Consistency: Automating document creation helps minimize errors and ensures consistency across all documents. This consistency not only enhances the quality of work but also reduces the time spent on revisions and proofreading, again contributing to efficiency. This is especially beneficial in areas such as contracts and pleadings.

    3. Client and Matter Management: Beyond document automation, ndMax/Pattern Builder can integrate well with your existing Client and Matter Management systems, providing a more streamlined workflow. This integration can help in quicker access to relevant documents and historical information, leading to improved client service and potentially more billable time as you have more focused client interactions.

    4. Training and Implementation: It’s important to consider the training and change management aspect. Providing thorough training and having a champion in-house who can assist others in learning the tool is crucial. Investing in training might seem additional upfront cost but can significantly improve the ROI as more team members learn to leverage the tool efficiently.

    5. ROI Considerations: Calculating the ROI isn’t just about the dollars saved, but also about long-term benefits such as improved client satisfaction, employee job satisfaction (since they spend less time on mundane tasks), and even potentially faster payment cycles as a result of more efficient matter management.

    6. Customization and Scalability: One of Pattern Builder’s key strengths is its ability to customize templates to suit different practice areas. This flexibility is particularly useful for firms with diverse legal service offerings and allows them to scale their

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *