Automated Contract Review - What is meant by "Automated"?

Automated Contract Review — What is meant by “Automated”?

4 March 2025

Understanding Automated Contract Review in LegalTech

In the rapidly evolving world of LegalTech, the term “automated” often surfaces, especially when discussing contract review solutions powered by artificial intelligence. But what exactly does “automated” mean in this context, and how does it compare to traditional methods used by attorneys?

Dissecting Automation in Contract Review

When LegalTech vendors describe their solutions as “automated,” they are typically drawing a parallel to the conventional processes utilized by legal professionals. In a traditional setting, contract review involves a painstaking, manual examination by attorneys, who meticulously comb through legal documents to identify key issues or discrepancies. This tried-and-true method, while reliable, is also notoriously time-consuming.

However, in the realm of automated contract review, technology changes the landscape significantly. Many AI-driven tools integrate seamlessly into platforms like Word, invoking automation through sophisticated algorithms that analyze contract data. Yet, this process isn’t entirely devoid of human input. Users are often required to provide commands or directives, such as choosing the appropriate playbook for an analysis or interacting with user-friendly chatbot interfaces to streamline the review process.

Is LegalTech Truly Automated?

The question then arises: Does this level of technology constitute true automation? While these systems reduce the need for manual labor significantly, they often still require some user intervention, somewhat akin to robotic process automation (RPA). The essence of the “automated” claim lies in minimizing traditional workflow steps, thereby increasing efficiency and accuracy.

Balancing Familiarity with Innovation

For seasoned transactional attorneys, embracing automation presents a crossroads of cost-benefit analysis. Sticking with conventional methods offers the comfort of familiarity, albeit with inherent delays. Conversely, adopting cutting-edge LegalTech solutions promises enhanced efficiency but necessitates learning new systems—potentially a daunting prospect for those accustomed to traditional “lawyering.”

In conclusion, while automated contract reviews represent a significant leap forward in LegalTech, understanding their true capabilities and limitations is crucial. They offer a valuable opportunity to enhance legal operations, though mastering these tools requires an openness to change and learning. As the legal industry continues to evolve, striking the right balance between the old and new will be essential for legal practitioners moving forward.

One response to “Automated Contract Review — What is meant by “Automated”?”

ccadmin

4 March 2025
The concept of “automated” in the context of contract review through LegalTech solutions can indeed be a bit nebulous without concrete examples of how these systems specifically operate. To truly grasp the meaning and benefits of “automated” in this context, it’s helpful to examine both the mechanics and the broader implications on legal practice.

Firstly, automation in LegalTech generally refers to the use of software, often powered by artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning algorithms, to handle routine and repetitive tasks traditionally performed by humans. In the realm of contract review, automation encompasses several aspects:
1. Speed and Efficiency: Automated solutions can process contracts at a much faster rate than manual reviews. The AI algorithms are designed to quickly identify clauses, highlight anomalies, and flag potential risks or compliance issues—tasks that could take human reviewers significantly longer to complete.
2. Consistency and Accuracy: While human reviewers might have discrepancies based on fatigue or varying expertise, AI-driven contract review tools aim to provide consistent results based on their programmed training and pattern recognition capabilities. They can potentially reduce human error by applying predetermined standards uniformly across multiple documents.
3. Advanced Features: More sophisticated automated systems integrate with existing legal databases to cross-reference contract clauses with existing legislation, case law, or a firm’s internal playbook standards. These integrations offer valuable insights that could elevate the quality of contract review by providing context that would otherwise require extensive manual research.
4. Customizability and Learning: As you’ve correctly noted, there is often an element of customization required. This might involve “training” the AI by providing sample data or selecting relevant playbooks. While this upfront work seems manual, it’s essential for tailoring the AI to a firm’s specific needs—essentially teaching it to “speak the language” of your particular legal domain. Moreover, these systems often learn and improve over time, gradually requiring less input as they become more adept at predicting your preferences and priorities.
In terms of practical advice for adopting this technology:
- Evaluate Your Needs: Consider the volume and complexity of contracts your practice handles. If your workload is largely routine and the documents similar in nature, AI could significantly reduce your workload. However, highly bespoke contracts still require human oversight.
- Trial and Experiment: Most vendors offer demos or trial periods. Utilize these to understand the software’s strengths and limitations. It will help mitigate the learning curve concerns you mentioned and guide your decision about whether the time investment in mastering a new
Reply

Contract Compliance